Letter from resistance

27
Category: Ozawa   Tags: ---

The counsel for the defense of Ozawa

11th trial
Ichiro Ozawa's (69) 11th trial about which Violation of the Political Funding Regulation Law (false entry) was asked about the land deal of a fund-managing organization "Rikuzankai" on the 20th. It was opened in Tokyo District Court on December 20, and the examination of witness of Professor Masao Yanaga (mercantile law) of Tukuba university was conducted as a specialist in accountancy.
Professor Yanaga said "In accounting,the written method of Rikuzankai is permitted concerning the statement to the income and expenditure reports on political funds involving land buying of problem.
The defendant Ozawa conspired with former secretaries about postponing registration of the land which Rikuzankai purchased in October, 2004, until January, 2005.
Ozawa was prosecuted as having written the price for land of about 352 million yen in the receipts and payments account for 05 years instead of 04 years.
About to which receipts and payments account of the 2004 fiscal year and the 2005 fiscal year,the price for land should be written ,Professor Yanaga said, "according to the fundamental rule they should fit the actual works to the registration (of the land in January, 2005)" . But Professor Yanaga supported Ozawa's opinion that it is not misrepresentation.

main200.jpg

Although Mr.Yanaga is a Professeur of mercantile law of Tukuba university,he overlooked the forth 400 million yen.400 million yen(5,148,668.00$) of the cash receipt and disbursement from 1 to 3 are offset by a cash margin and the land buying. However, only 4th 400 million yen (5,148,668.00$) is not offset.
The flow of the funds of 400 million yen from 1 to 3 is for deceiving the embezzlement of 4th 400 million clearly.This fact must not be overlooked.Mr.Yanaga is too incapacity to teach the accountancy.Even if Mr.Yanaga looked at the account book,even if he heard testimony of Ikeda, Mr.Yanaga could not perceive Ozawa's injustice that Ozawa pocketed 400 million yen.




The Liberal Democratic Party and the Komei Party should demand the summons of witness in Parliament to Ozawa so that administration of justice may not accept Ozawa's dismissal of prosecution unfairly.


ozawagomakashichart.jpg

The counsel for the defense of Ozawa applied for the written petition to demand revocation of the prosecution. The counsel for the defense of Ozawa claimed that Since the 5th Committee for the Inquest of Prosecution of Tokyo made a different report from secretary Ishikawa's contents of recording, the decision of prosecution of the 5th Committee for the Inquest of Prosecution of Tokyo is invalid.

Article 340 When a ruling of dismissal of prosecution based on revocation of the prosecution becomes final and binding, prosecution for the same case shall not be instituted again unless there is the new discovery of an important fact.

But the 4th 400 million yen is a slush fund clearly, if everyone see a flow chart.
Since there was testimony of the flow of the fund of 4th 400 million yen of Ikeda, revocation of the prosecution should not be allowed.
Please see a left chart.
400 million yen(5,148,668.00$) of the cash receipt and disbursement from 1 to 3 are offset by a cash margin and the land buying. However, only 4th 400 million yen (5,148,668.00$) is not offset.
The flow of the funds of 400 million yen from 1 to 3 is for deceiving the embezzlement of 4th 400 million clearly.
The former secretary Ikeda testified at the seventh trial that Ikeda had gathered 400 million yen from the account of the related political organizations, and had repaid 400 million yen to Ozawa.
First of all, in the schedule of Ozawa's trials there are more only 2 times.

1   October 6
2   October 14
3   October 28
4   November 1
5   November 30
6   December 1
7   December 7
8   December 8
9   December 15 The examination of witness of two public prosecutor.
One of them is Tsunehiko Maeda convict (44) who are a former public prosecutor.

10  December 16 The examination of witness of the other public prosecutor
11  December 20
12  January 10
13  January 11

There was an information that Ozawa obtained nearly 2 billion contributions from one ODA enterprise, in December, and Ozawa may hand a bribe to a judge, and may escape the trial. The court should reject the application of the counsel for the defense of Ozawa.
Ozawa is going to prevent what other witnesses testify.
We need the power of American government high officials . I want to prevent Ozawa escaping from his trial. Please cooperate.


Details of a defendant's legal faculty

Details of the legal faculty of a plaintiff

Details of the judge



1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

top bottom